Oral Presentation Sydney Spinal Symposium 2026

Effect of sagittal alignment on spinal cord biomechanics in the stenotic cervical spine during neck flexion and extension (141386)

Karthik Banurekha Devaraj 1 , Shalini Gundamraj 2 , Balaji Harinathan 3 , Anjishnu Banerjee 3 , Narayan Yoganandan 3 , Aditya Vedantam 3
  1. Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  2. Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
  3. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States

Spinal cord stress and strain contribute to degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), while cervical kyphosis is known to negatively impact surgical outcomes. In DCM, the relationship between spinal cord biomechanics, sagittal alignment, and cord compression is not well understood. Quantifying this relationship can guide surgical strategies. A previously validated three-dimensional finite element model of the human cervical spine with spinal cord was used. Three models of cervical alignment were created: lordosis (C2–C7 Cobb angle: 20°), straight (0°), and kyphosis (− 9°). C5–C6 spinal stenosis was simulated with ventral disk protrusions, reducing spinal canal diameters to 10 mm, 8 mm, and 6 mm. Spinal cord pre-stress and pre-strain due to alignment and compression were quantified. Cervical flexion and extension were simulated with a pure moment load of 2 Nm. The Von Mises stress and maximum principal strain of the whole spinal cord were calculated during neck motion and the relationship between spinal cord biomechanics, alignment, and compression was analyzed using linear regression analysis. Spinal cord pre-stress and pre-strain were greatest with kyphosis (7.53 kPa, 5.4%). Progressive kyphosis and stenosis were associated with an increase in spinal cord stress (R2 = 0.99) and strain (R2 = 0.99). Cervical kyphosis was associated with greater spinal cord stress and strain during neck flexion–extension and the magnitude of difference increased with increasing stenosis. Cervical kyphosis increases baseline spinal cord stress and strain. Incorporating sagittal alignment with compression to calculate spinal cord biomechanics is necessary to accurately quantify spinal stress and strain during neck flexion and extension.

  1. Barrey C, Rousseau M-A, Persohn S et al (2015) Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25(Suppl 1):S155-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1625-2
  2. Bilston LE, Thibault LE (1996) The mechanical properties of the human cervical spinal cord in vitro. Ann Biomed Eng 24:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02770996
  3. Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA (1999) Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 14:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00036-9
  4. Wheeldon JA, Pintar FA, Knowles S, Yoganandan N (2006) Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine. J Biomech 39:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.014
  5. Chen IH, Vasavada A, Panjabi MM (1994) Kinematics of the cervical spine canal: changes with sagittal plane loads. J Spinal Disord 7:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199407020-00001